Site: Home > News and events
Introduction of Anti Synthetic blood penetration testing
Workers, primarily those in the health care profession, involved in treating and caring for individuals injured or sick, can be exposed to biological liquids capable of transmitting disease. These diseases, which may be caused by a variety of microorganisms, can pose significant risks to life and health. This is especially true of blood-borne viruses that cause hepatitis [Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)] and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) [Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)]. Since engineering controls cannot eliminate all possible exposures, attention is placed on reducing the potential of direct skin contact through the use of protective clothing that resists penetration. This test method was developed for ranking the synthetic blood penetration resistance performance of medical face masks in a manner representing actual use as might occur when the face mask is contacted by a high velocity stream of blood from a punctured wound.
The test method is intended to evaluate the protection of the health care provider’s face from exposure to blood and body fluids. It is used to evaluate the resistance of medical face masks to penetration by synthetic blood under high-velocity liquid contact with the medical face mask surface of a fixed volume over a relatively short period of time (0 s to 2,5 s). Medical face mask “pass/fail” determinations are based on visual detection of synthetic blood penetration.
NOTE 1:
Medical face masks are intended to resist liquid penetration from the splatter or splashing of blood, body fluids, and other potentially infectious materials. Many factors can affect the wetting and penetration characteristics of body fluids, such as: surface tension; viscosity; and polarity of the fluid, as well as the structure and relative hydrophilicity or hydrophobicity of the materials. The surface tension range for blood and body fluids (excluding saliva) is approximately 0,042 N/m to 0,060 N/m[1]. To help simulate the wetting characteristics of blood and body fluids, the surface tension of the synthetic blood is adjusted to approximate the lower end of this surface tension range. The resulting surface tension of the synthetic blood is (0,042 ± 0,002) N/m.
NOTE 2:
During a medical procedure, a blood vessel can be punctured resulting in a high-velocity stream of blood impacting a protective medical face mask. The impact velocity depends on several factors, the most important being the blood pressure of the patient. A second factor is the distance from the puncture. The velocity of larger punctures drops because the pressure in the blood vessel drops quickly. Because only small punctures cause high-velocity streams, large punctures were not used to model the range of blood-splatter velocities considered in this test. Furthermore, this test method is based on the assumption that the medical face mask will be in close proximity to the puncture area. This test method is therefore based on the impact velocity of a stream of fluid that corresponds to the target blood pressure.
NOTE 3:
The mean human blood pressure generally varies over a range of about 10,6 kPa to 16,0 kPa (80 mm Hg to 120 mm Hg)[2]. In this test method, medical face masks are tested at stream velocities corresponding to 10,6 kPa, 16,0 kPa, and 21,3 kPa (80 mm Hg, 120 mm Hg, and 160 mm Hg, respectively). This test method permits the use of other non-standard test pressures, stream velocities, fluid volumes, and specimen orientations for evaluating medical face mask penetration resistance consistent with specific applications.
This International Standard does not apply to all forms or conditions of blood-borne pathogen exposure. Users of the test method should review modes for face exposure and assess the appropriateness of this test method for their specific application.
This International Standard primarily addresses the performance of materials or certain material constructions used in medical face masks. This test method does not address the performance of the medical face mask's design, construction, interfaces or other factors which may affect the overall protection offered by the medical face mask and its operation (such as filtration efficiency and pressure drop).
This test method does not address breathability of the medical face mask materials or any other properties affecting the ease of breathing through the medical face mask. This test method evaluates medical face masks as an item of protective clothing. This test method does not evaluate the performance of medical face masks as protection against contamination via airborne exposure pathways or in the prevention of the penetration of aerosolized body fluids deposited on the medical face mask.
NOTE 4:
Users of this test method should realize that certain tradeoffs exist between improved resistance of medical face masks to penetration by synthetic blood and in pressure drop across mask materials which is an indicator of the breathability of the face mask. In general, increasing synthetic blood penetration resistance for medical face masks results in increasing pressure drop or reduced breathability for medical face masks of the same design and fit of the individual wearer.
NOTE 5:
This test method evaluates medical face masks as an item of protective clothing and does not evaluate medical face masks as respirators. If respiratory protection for the wearer is needed, an approved respirator should be used. This test method can be used to evaluate the resistance of a respirator to penetration by synthetic blood, if warranted.
2020-08-14 10:33
- Related News
Ozone Aging Test Chamber: Understanding Four Concentration Test Methods
How to properly maintain the horizontal and vertical combustion tester?
What you must know about the Xenon lamp aging test chamber filter
Application of Ventilation Aging Test Chamber on Polymer Materials
3 Tips for Purchasing Aging Test Chambers
Matters that must be avoided in the operation of the UV aging test chamber
How to use the UV aging test chamber lamp correctly?
Wire and cable test artifact - ozone aging test box
3 aging factors that must be simulated in the aging test box
The role of Burning Manikin System in the field of thermal protection